Omid Malekan 质疑“代币化存款不如稳定币,但至少能全天候链上即时转账”的说法,指出大型银行也能在内部提供即时转账,未必需要区块链。按 Claude 的数据,美国五大银行去年仅技术支出就超过 $40b;他认为银行没有全面推出实时支付,原因并非缺少能在夜间和周末运行的数据库。
Many people respond to my critique of tokenized deposits by arguing "OK fine, not as good as stables, but at least you can transfer them instantly 24/7 on chain."
The implication here is banks couldn't offer the same thing internally. Alas, the 5 biggest US banks spent over $40b on tech last year alone (per Claude).
Do you really think they don't offer instant internal transfers "because they need new tech like a blockchain to do it"?
I assure you that's not the reason. Databases that don't shut down on nights and weekends actually do exist. The technical term for them is databases.
Now ponder the real reason why every single bank doesn't offer real-time payments and didn't roll this out a decade ago.
来源:Omid Malekan· x.com